Question: "What was the first / original church? Is the original / first church the true church?"
Answer:
The ability to trace one's church back to the “first church” through apostolic succession
is an argument used by a number of different churches to assert that
their church is the “one true church.” The Roman Catholic Church makes
this claim. The Greek Orthodox Church makes this claim. Some Protestant
denominations make this claim. Some of the “Christian” cults make this
claim. How do we know which church is correct? The biblical answer is –
it does not matter!
The first church, its growth, doctrine, and practices, were recorded for
us in the New Testament. Jesus, as well as His apostles, foretold that
false teachers would arise, and indeed it is apparent from some of the
New Testament epistles that these apostles had to fight against false
teachers early on. Having a pedigree of apostolic succession or being
able to trace a church's roots back to the "first church" is nowhere in
Scripture given as a test for being the true church. What is given is
repeated comparisons between what false teachers teach and what the
first church taught, as recorded in Scripture. Whether a church is the
"true church" or not is determined by comparing its teachings and
practices to that of the New Testament church, as recorded in Scripture.
For instance, in Acts 20:17-38,
the Apostle Paul has an opportunity to talk to the church leaders in
the large city of Ephesus one last time face to face. In that passage,
he tells them that false teachers will not only come among them but will
come FROM them (vv. 29-30). Paul does not set forth the teaching that
they were to follow the "first" organized church as a safeguard for the
truth. Rather, he commits them to the safekeeping of "God and to the
word of His grace" (v. 32). Thus, truth could be determined by depending
upon God and "the word of His grace" (i.e., Scripture, see John 10:35).
This dependence upon the Word of God, rather than following certain individual "founders" is seen again in Galatians 1:8-9,
in which Paul states, "But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach
any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be
accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches
any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be
accursed." Thus, the basis for determining truth from error is not based
upon even WHO it is that is teaching it, “we or an angel from heaven,”
but whether it is the same gospel that they had already received – and
this gospel is recorded in Scripture.
Another example of this dependence upon the Word of God is found in 2
Peter. In this epistle, the Apostle Peter is fighting against false
teachers. In doing so, Peter begins by mentioning that we have a "more
sure word" to depend upon than even hearing the voice of God from heaven
as they did at Jesus' transfiguration (2 Peter 1:16-21).
This “more sure word” is the written Word of God. Peter later tells
them again to be mindful of "the words which were spoken before by the
holy prophets and the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and
Savior" (2 Peter 3:2). Both the words of the holy prophets and the commandments Jesus gave to the apostles are recorded in Scripture.
How do we determine whether a church is teaching correct doctrine or
not? The only infallible standard that Scripture says that we have is
the Bible (Isaiah 8:20; 2 Timothy 3:15-17; Matthew 5:18; John 10:35; Isaiah 40:8; 1 Peter 2:25; Galatians 1:6-9). Tradition is a part of every church, and that tradition must be compared to God's Word, lest it go against what is true (Mark 7:1-13).
It is true that the cults and sometimes orthodox churches twist the
interpretation of Scripture to support their practices; nonetheless,
Scripture, when taken in context and faithfully studied, is able to
guide one to the truth.
The “first church” is the church that is recorded in the New Testament,
especially in the Book of Acts and the Epistles of Paul. The New
Testament church is the “original church” and the “one true church.” We
can know this because it is described, in great detail, in Scripture.
The church, as recorded in the New Testament, is God’s pattern and
foundation for His church. On this basis, let’s examine the Roman
Catholic claim that it is the “first church.” Nowhere in the New
Testament will you find the “one true church” doing any of the
following: praying to Mary, praying to the saints, venerating Mary,
submitting to a pope, having a select priesthood, baptizing an infant,
observing the ordinances of baptism and the Lord’s Supper as sacraments(although this practice is not wrong as they practices of utmost importance in the christian faith, and baptism for infants too taking note that they are born with the original sin of Adam),
or passing on apostolic authority to successors of the apostles. All of
these are core elements of the Roman Catholic faith. If most of the
core elements of the Roman Catholic Church were not practiced by the New
Testament Church (the first church and one true church), how then can
the Roman Catholic Church be the first church? A study of the New
Testament will clearly reveal that the Roman Catholic Church is not the
same church as the church that is described in the New Testament.
The New Testament records the history of the church from approximately
A.D. 30 to approximately A.D. 90. In the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th centuries,
history records several Roman Catholic doctrines and practices among
early Christians. Is it not logical that the earliest Christians would
be more likely to understand what the Apostles truly meant? Yes, it is
logical, but there is one problem. Christians in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th
centuries were not the earliest Christians. Again, the New Testament
records the doctrine and practice of the earliest Christians…and, the
New Testament does not teach Roman Catholicism. What is the explanation
for why the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th century church began to exhibit signs of
Roman Catholicism?
The answer is simple – the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th century (and following)
church did not have the complete New Testament. Churches had portions of
the New Testament, but the New Testament (and the full Bible) were not
commonly available until after the invention of the printing press in
A.D. 1440. The early church did its best in passing on the teachings of
the apostles through oral tradition, and through extremely limited
availability to the Word in written form. At the same time, it is easy
to see how false doctrine could creep into a church that only had access
to the Book of Galatians, for example. It is very interesting to note
that the Protestant Reformation followed very closely after the
invention of the printing press and the translation of the Bible into
the common languages of the people. Once people began to study the Bible
for themselves, it became very clear how far the Roman Catholic Church
had departed from the church that is described in the New Testament.
Scripture never mentions using "which church came first" as the basis
for determining which is the "true" church. What it does teach is that
one is to use Scripture as the determining factor as to which church is
preaching the truth and thus is true to the first church. It is
especially important to compare Scripture with a church's teaching on
such core issues as the full deity and humanity of Christ, the atonement
for sin through His blood on Calvary, salvation from sin by grace
through faith, and the infallibility of the Scriptures. The “first
church” and “one true church” is recorded in the New Testament. That is
the church that all churches are to follow, emulate, and model
themselves after.
first churchorigin of christianityorigin of the churchthe church
the first / original church? was is the true church?. is the roman catholic church the first original church?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




No comments:
Post a Comment